You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Our current Subscription method, which appears to allow users to subscribe to a specific proof type, is actually providing access to a particular pub-sub topic. This is not in line with our intended functionality, as pub-sub interactions should be restricted to internal usage only. To address this issue, I propose that we discontinue the option for users to interact with the pub-sub mechanism. Instead, we should offer a subscription to the datastore where proofs are stored. This subscription would return an iterator, enabling users to navigate between different proofs for a single proof type. Additionally, implementing this change would grant us the capability to enable subscriptions even before the service starts, a feature that is currently unavailable.
Moreover, this new approach would allow us to access proofs one by one, which is especially beneficial when dealing with a large number of proofs. It simplifies the process of finding a specific proof among many.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Our current Subscription method, which appears to allow users to subscribe to a specific proof type, is actually providing access to a particular pub-sub topic. This is not in line with our intended functionality, as pub-sub interactions should be restricted to internal usage only. To address this issue, I propose that we discontinue the option for users to interact with the pub-sub mechanism. Instead, we should offer a subscription to the datastore where proofs are stored. This subscription would return an iterator, enabling users to navigate between different proofs for a single proof type. Additionally, implementing this change would grant us the capability to enable subscriptions even before the service starts, a feature that is currently unavailable.
Moreover, this new approach would allow us to access proofs one by one, which is especially beneficial when dealing with a large number of proofs. It simplifies the process of finding a specific proof among many.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: