Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

switch to multi_json #33

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

switch to multi_json #33

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

xn
Copy link

@xn xn commented Jun 28, 2018

This switches out json_pure for multi_json. json_pure stops some rubyists from utilizing your service because it is incompatible with other json libraries they might be using. This is a drop in replacement and no loss of functionality or speed will occur for existing users. Furthermore, customers using other json libraries like oj will have a marked speed increase.

Also, I added a Gemfile so I could easily install your gems, fixed a broken test and edited a redundant line of code.

Thanks for considering this!

@xn xn mentioned this pull request Jun 28, 2018
@ghiculescu
Copy link

@cb-gaurav sorry to ping you directly but saw you were recently active here. is there any chance the CB team will consider merging this soon? (if the cnoflicts are fixed)

@DanielGilchrist
Copy link

Hey @cb-khushbubibay It seems like you're one of the core maintainers of this repo currently and I realise this PR is really old but would chargebee consider an implementation with multi_json instead of json_pure for the reasons mentioned in the PR body and linked issue? I'd definitely be willing to make a PR based on this off current master if so 🙂 If not I think we should close this PR as well as the linked issue here #30

@cb-khushbubibay
Copy link
Contributor

cb-khushbubibay commented Jul 21, 2023

Hi @DanielGilchrist
Thank you for raising this concern. We sincerely appreciate your input. If it's possible, could you please create a forked repository and raise a pull request with the suggested changes without conflicts. This way, we can check its feasibility and review the modifications.

@DanielGilchrist
Copy link

Hi @DanielGilchrist Thank you for raising this concern. We sincerely appreciate your input. If it's possible, could you please create a forked repository and raise a pull request with the suggested changes without conflicts. This way, we can check its feasibility and review the modifications.

Awesome thank you and no worries! I'll try and find some time next week to get a PR up :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants