Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Would using pymbar's autocorrelation module be useful in reducing the number of simulations required when running non-eq FEP? #525

Open
DreamCykl opened this issue Mar 7, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@DreamCykl
Copy link

The idea behind non-equilibrium FEP is to extract snapshots from equilibrated end states for both lambda 0 and lambda 1. You then use these snapshots as starting configurations to run short transition simulations, pushing lambda from its one state to the other.

It is my understanding that accurate estimations of ddG require uncorrelated samples, and therefore can we make the inference that supplying multiple correlated samples is redundant, when a single one of these samples could be used instead?

If I were to extract only the uncorrelated snapshots from my EQ end state simulation, and only run transition simulations with these, would I be reducing my computational overheads? I.e., I could reduce the number of transitions I'm running by only running uncorrelated ones. If so, is it possible to extract uncorrelated frames using pymbars autocorrelation functions?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant