You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Worth deciding on a cadence for refreshing the Glitch-hosted example / showcase site for Postmarks. Especially with the UI improvements from #122 and related PRs, it is noticeably out of date at the time of opening this issue.
Questions:
should it always be postmarks.glitch.me
I think that's fine (it aims to be a simple single-user app that can run on something like Glitch); but maybe another location would be another option
should there be more than one showcase site we link out to
should this be nightly / on push / driven by GH Actions
would this make more sense to be based on actual versioned releases
this is a good idea, and will dovetail nicely with me documenting some things around how to update your deployment when you've got it hosted somewhere with a git repo connected to it. (I did just go ahead and update the example deployment to grab the sweet new look, though, thanks!)
On a related topic, I deployed a Postmarks on Replit to confirm it is a straightforward thing to do. I imagine Glitch might be the main suggested deployment target, but I’ll write up the Replit instructions at some point, possibly on the wiki rather than adding n+1 deployment targets to the README.
for the record, I don't necessarily want Glitch to be the primary deploy target, I just want one that results in instructions that are as simple as possible, and I knew Glitch best to understand the ergonomics of how to do things like have a functioning demo site + make the SQLite db not copy over on remix.
I don't know Replit super well, but I did read that they're going to be winding down their always-on tier. Do they still have a wake-on-request tier like Glitch's free version?
Worth deciding on a cadence for refreshing the Glitch-hosted example / showcase site for Postmarks. Especially with the UI improvements from #122 and related PRs, it is noticeably out of date at the time of opening this issue.
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: