Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the API page needs an update wrt centres listing #278

Closed
bansp opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

the API page needs an update wrt centres listing #278

bansp opened this issue Jun 6, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
API homework stuff to think about actively between meetings SIS:centres centre-oriented part of the SIS
Milestone

Comments

@bansp
Copy link
Member

bansp commented Jun 6, 2024

Oopsie: now, with the centres.xml gone and redistributed among the individual recommendations, we need an update of the API page at https://standards.clarin.eu/sis/views/api.xq (see the last section).

@bansp bansp added bug SIS:centres centre-oriented part of the SIS API labels Jun 6, 2024
@bansp bansp added this to the SIS v. 2.8.0 milestone Jun 6, 2024
@bansp bansp removed the bug label Jun 7, 2024
@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Jun 7, 2024

BUT... maybe we could turn the tables a bit on this one. Why don't we generate centres.xml by script from the recommendations, in time adding to that the functionality from #242 (a check for whether the links are live, etc.).

In that way, the API and its documentation could remain as they are, and the script would act as yet another consistency check.

@margaretha margaretha added the homework stuff to think about actively between meetings label Jun 7, 2024
@bansp
Copy link
Member Author

bansp commented Jun 19, 2024

We're postponing the script issue and the main issue is solved, so closing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
API homework stuff to think about actively between meetings SIS:centres centre-oriented part of the SIS
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants