-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 223
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Corobo Integration,Security and Enhancements. #688
Comments
This is an odd assortment of issues. Please provide more clarity on the goal of the project proposal. Random features are not a GSoC project. |
Okay I will try and compile a more fixed goal.The main goal of the project
was the improvement of corobo so should I focus on only one aspect like
integration. Should I resubmit the form or just make the project
description more clear
…On Sun, Nov 11, 2018, 7:26 AM John Vandenberg ***@***.*** wrote:
This is an odd assortment of issues. Please provide more clarity on the
goal of the project proposal.
Random features are not a GSoC project.
—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#688 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AbgGHqgflPNY66gcqZgDfU_yCGl1qoGUks5ut4O7gaJpZM4YS9xc>
.
|
Add more comments here, and discuss with potential mentors on gitter. |
Can you suggest any potential mentors or any feedback? |
You should be able to determine who the potential mentors are. If not, you have not done enough work on developing your idea. |
As per his consent and agreement I have tagged @nvzard as a potential mentor for this project. |
Possible ideas. Maybe these implementations plus ideas by students can be a potential project.
|
|
@nvzard When opening an issue on the projects page could you separate it into |
@abhishalya your inputs would be highly valuable as well 👍 |
What are the upsides of doing this? Just because the user who opened the issue becomes the owner of the issue..? Not a good enough reason to implement the whole OAuth flow, and if it is through personal access tokens, I guess those maybe possible, but those are more manual steps on user sides and not such a good UX. Anyways, we still need a good enough reason to do this I guess. |
cc : @Makman2 @nvzard @Vamshi99
Features: |
Potential Mentor: @nvzard @Vamshi99
Integration
Rebuild CIs using corobo corobo#190.
corobo rebuild travis|circle|appveyor <PR number>
.corobo status travis|circle|appveyor <PR number>
.Security
Implementation Details:
Trigger Travis CI builds using the API V3 by sending a POST request to /repo/{slug|id}/requests:
This can be leveraged in building the project.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: