Thanks for thinking about helping! How would you like to help?
- I want to build a new feature.
- I want to improve the documentation.
- I want to fix a bug.
- I want to refactor some code.
- I don't know how to help.
-
Run the tests. We only take pull requests with passing tests, and it's great to know that you have a clean slate:
bundle && bundle exec rake
Okay, you're ready to go now. How do you want to help?
If there's already an issue for the feature you want to tackle, how complete is the description? Do you know what to do next? Do you know what right looks like?
If there's not an issue yet, write one.
Whether you're writing a new issue or improving on an existing issue, be sure to clarify exactly how you expect the finished change to look and work.
One of the best ways to write a feature is in user story format:
As an [actor], I want to do [action], so that [benefit].
For example, let's say we wanted to write some Slack integration for new comments posted to a Code Corps project. That user story might look something like:
As a project maintainer, I want to see new comments on my project post in my Slack channel so that everyone can see and react to some of the latest changes in the project.
You may want to go deeper into detail. Posting screenshots of designs or expected test cases and scenarios are even more helpful. Place yourself in the shoes of the person who's going to accomplish the task – even if that person is you. What steps should I be taking next to finish this task?
Once you've created the issue, you can make your changes and push them up.
- I want to improve the documentation of the API endpoints.
- I want to document some of the internals of the Rails app.
- I want to improve the docs on GitHub.
We're still trying to figure this out, but you can follow this journey issue and see some of the Closed
pull requests for how to document.
We're using API Blueprint for writing our docs, and you can use the Apiary CLI tool to preview them.
API Blueprint has a quick tutorial you can read that walks through writing your first docs in the API Blueprint language.
You can read more examples here or check our own blueprint for examples.
You will be working with the blueprint/api.apib
document. You'll likely be adding any number of:
- Resource Groups
- Resources
- Actions
- URI Templates
- URI Parameters
- Data Structures
Data Structures often serve as your base objects for assembling the higher-level endpoint documentation. These objects are composeable – like Lego blocks – in new and often interesting ways.
The /users/:id
endpoint documented in the User
resource group, for example, may contain a User Response
for its 200
response. This User Response
data structure is itself composed of a User
data structure (which collects the attributes for that user like email
and username
) and a User Relationships Base
data structure, which includes yet more data structures like the User Skills Relationship
.
By creating small, modular pieces, we can assemble complex data structures that describe our API.
You can preview your changes by walking through our guide on how to generate API documentation locally.
You can see how much code is documented on Inch CI.
The Rails guides have some further thoughts on how to document which apply well here.
If you're just looking to improve the README, there's a couple things you should know:
- Open an issue first. It's better if we discuss your proposed changes.
- We try to keep the main
README.md
lightweight and use it as a jumping point to other docs. - Most other docs can be placed in
/docs
. - Try to make it easy for people to jump around in your doc.
If you're fixing a bug that's already been added to the issues, ask yourself whether the bug description is clear? Do you know what circumstances led to the bug? Does it seem easy to reproduce?
If you've spotted a bug yourself, open an issue and try to answer those questions.
Then start writing some code:
- Make the tests fail.
Identify what's happening in the bug with a test. This way the bug is reproducible for everyone else in the project, and we won't regress into making the bug ever again (hopefully!).
- Make the tests pass again.
Write your code that fixes the bug and makes it pass.
Refactoring code shouldn't require any new tests, but you should make sure the tests still pass.
When you're ready to write some new code, you should do the following:
- Write some documentation for your change.
Why do this first? Well, if you know the behavior you want to see, then it's easier to validate if it works as expected. Think of this as documentation-driven development.
What kind of documentation are you writing?
-
Add a test for your change. Here's how to run tests.
-
Make the test pass.
Try to keep your changes to a max of around 200 lines of code whenever possible. Why do this? Apparently the more changes incurred in a pull request, the likelier it is that people who review your code will just gloss over the details. Smaller pull requests get more comments and feedback than larger ones. Crazy, right?
Done with your changes and ready for a review?
Not a problem! You can try looking around for issues that say good for new contributors
. Documentation really is a good place to start. If you're still not sure, just join our Slack and flag someone down. Someone can help point you in the right direction.
Now you just need to push your finished code to your fork and submit a pull request.
At this point you're waiting on us. We like to at least comment on, if not accept, pull requests within a week's time. We may suggest some changes or improvements or alternatives.
Some things that will increase the chance that your pull request is accepted, taken straight from the Ruby on Rails guide:
- Use Rails idioms and helpers
- Include tests that fail without your code, and pass with it
- Update the documentation, the surrounding one, examples elsewhere, guides, whatever is affected by your contribution
Has your code been reviewed? Here's what we need before we can merge.
If you've had a pull request reviewed and accepted, congratulations! Before we can merge your changes, we'll need you to rebase off origin/develop
and squash your commits into one. This will give us a cleaner git history.
Never done this before? No problem. We'll walk you through it in our guide, and you can read a deeper guide about rewriting history to understand more.
We use RSpec for unit tests. If you submit tests that are not written for RSpec without a very good reason, you will be asked to rewrite them before we'll accept.
We've written some convenience helpers to help with API testing. The helpers are found in spec/support/helpers
as:
ApiHelpers
authenticate
which is an authentication helper that uses OAuth2 to authenticate requests and return a token used to make future requests.
JsonApiHelpers
post
,update
,patch
andput
which wrap API requests in JSON API format
RequestHelpers
json
which returns the JSON of the last response as a Ruby objectauthenticated_get(path, args, token)
(and_post
,_put
,_delete
) which takes the URL path, any arguments, and the token generated by theauthenticate
method above. You can grep for good examples of these in action.
These helpers are included in specs by default by requiring the rails_helper
. You can then call these methods directly in any test.