Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Thoughts on sustainable governance #1105

Open
wwahammy opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 4 comments
Open

Thoughts on sustainable governance #1105

wwahammy opened this issue Oct 27, 2019 · 4 comments

Comments

@wwahammy
Copy link

wwahammy commented Oct 27, 2019

First off, awesome work on Delayed Job. I'm immensely grateful for what's been done here and I'm really dependent on Delayed Job continuing to be amazing.

Given that, I'm wondering if the leaders here have given any thought on how we can get more people involved. With so much work being done with Delayed Job,it's not sustainable for so much work to be on the plate of a very small group of maintainers. Undoubtedly, no one is suggesting everyone can become maintainers overnight. But perhaps it'd be helpful to look into how to get folks more involved and overtime build them into being maintainers themselves. After all, we all want Delayed Job to succeed!

@wwahammy
Copy link
Author

wwahammy commented Jan 4, 2020

@albus522 just wanted to poke this again. Any thoughts on this?

@fwolfst
Copy link

fwolfst commented Apr 5, 2020

Ouh, this looks kinda bad...

@mockdeep
Copy link

@albus522 any chance you'd be willing to add me as maintainer? I'd be happy to help get PRs merged and issues addressed. I've been helping out with rmagick for a little while now and we've been able to get that project back in motion. If CollectiveIdea doesn't want to maintain it anymore, we can move it to another org.

@ethanmills
Copy link

@danielmorrison are you able to add anything to this?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants