Prioritize participants in visualization | Case in Uruguay #1315
-
Hey! I'm glad to share that we are using pol.is in an ongoing referendum campaign in Uruguay. The site is luc.com.uy . As you can see, the visualization is becoming crowded. We would like to limit the number of participants in the graph, but also prioritize or fix some of them. For example in the event that some public person or politician participates, we would like her or him to appear always. Can you think of a way of doing this? Thank you!! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 8 replies
-
Congratulations on what looks like a successful deployment and conversation! We'd love to know more about the case study as it wraps up and would invite you to submit open data afterwards along with a report. We have had this feature in moderation view previously. It didn't get a lot of use! Your use case is the exact reason we did build it there in the first place, however: to ensure public persons would be displayed. I'm not sure the best way to implement this now (the old one listed potentially thousands of people in a list, not particularly useful) so it would seem to me that it's like a "search" and then "pin". |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here's a ticket to track the re-introduction of this feature: #458 (feel free to +1 or leave additional thoughts there :) ) And here's a ticket that shows how it used to look, since it's hard to deploy a working version of the app from that point in the codebase (before we all put in some time to get docker working smoothly): #129 (comment) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hey @raulsperoni. As @patcon pointed out, we are tracking this issue on #458, and you're welcome to submit a PR for that if you have the bandwidth. If you just want to get something working for now, as pointed out in that issue, this was something we actually used to have support for, and so the database/server/participant-view infrastructure for it should already mostly exist (just not the admin view). So you could always root around in the |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hey @raulsperoni.
As @patcon pointed out, we are tracking this issue on #458, and you're welcome to submit a PR for that if you have the bandwidth.
If you just want to get something working for now, as pointed out in that issue, this was something we actually used to have support for, and so the database/server/participant-view infrastructure for it should already mostly exist (just not the admin view). So you could always root around in the
participants
and/orparticipants_extended
tables to sus out how to trigger this, and do so manually with a handful of SQL commands.