Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

incl_dec and NoDup_dec should be Defined and not Qed #25

Open
jjhugues opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

incl_dec and NoDup_dec should be Defined and not Qed #25

jjhugues opened this issue Apr 21, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@jjhugues
Copy link

Description of the problem

As part of a discussion on coq-club@, Xavier Leroy suggested I report that
incl_dec and NoDup_dec from theories/Lists/ListDec.v should be Defined and not Qed so that they become transparent and can be used. This would be compatible with In_decfrom theories/Lists/List.v that is also Defined.

Coq Version

Current Github master branch
@eponier eponier mentioned this issue May 20, 2021
Closed
3 tasks
@proux01 proux01 transferred this issue from coq/coq Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Make a few sumbool lemmas of stdlib transparent eponier/coq
1 participant
@jjhugues