We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
If the intent is to specialize integral_constant with a non-integral type, then this should be clear in the text.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ditto the Function specialization of this template.
Function
Sorry, something went wrong.
I agree it's a wording defect; I believe it can be handled post-publication though as the intent is clear:
with a static data member named value of type X and value x, where...
No branches or pull requests
If the intent is to specialize integral_constant with a non-integral type, then this should be clear in the text.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: