-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Waterfox 2020-10 issue with Snap Links 3.1.11? #388
Comments
Have you tried other websites? Does it show N links selected? |
Yes I tested Google & Wikipedia & other websites, I got nothing. and yes, the link numbers is displayed when I drag a selection. |
I restored my version from my old waterfox profile, Snap Links 3.1.8, now it works. I hope it can help. |
Even today the trouble remain with WaterFox Classic (the current version is 2022.08) sic... Apparently there is a plan (or a roadmap) then I'm wonder if you can give us any news (or a little summary) ? Because perhaps there is a trouble with Firefox Nightly (version 106) sic... The last commit is old (8 months for "Snap Links Plus v3.2") ! PS : If you need more information, let me (us) now. Perhaps I will be able to give them (and to be more precise). |
Nor @cpriest or I have had time to put into SLP3 recently. It happens to work fine enough for my usage thus I don't have a need for putting a lot of effort into it, tbh. Currently we try to have it working on multiple OS and last Firefox version, which is really not a piece of cake given the recent changes of behavior... Having Waterfox to work would be a bonus... |
Hello!
I just did a refresh install of Waterfox 2020-10, I used frequently Snap Links until now on the same version of Waterfox, but now I'm unable to make it work and I don't know why.
My version of Snap Links is 3.1.11, I still can drag a selection around links, but nothing happens, no links opening. I tried previous versions of Snap Links provided by Firefox add-ons website, same problem.
But for some reasons, the multiple checkboxes function is still ok.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: