Replies: 2 comments
-
Never mind. I now believe the problem is that the server is receiving the command using a UDPServer component and sending the reply back using a separate UDPClient component. There is a good reason the software is doing that, but there must be something else stored in the raw packet headers that doesn't match when it is sent back that way which routers and firewalls detect and block. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
I know you closed this discussion, but you are describing some common problems. Some things to consider...
Hope that helps others who find this thread. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I'm using Packet Sender to test a server app that receives commands via UDP and sends an answer back to the sender to the correct IP/Port. On the local LAN this only works if Packet Sender is added to the Windows Firewall. Why is that. Yet replies to outbound TCP messages are returned (via a different app). Is it standard practice for a firewall to block replies to outbound UDP messages? How would DNS work in that case?
Even if I do open the firewall or disable it, if the server app is run from a data center outside the LAN, an outbound UDP message gets to the server but no replies come back via the local router. I thought a router keeps track of outbound traffic and it will accept inbound on the same IP/port that it was sent to, but that also doesn't happen. The only way I get a response is if I quickly configure a port forward for the random UDP port Packet Sender decided to use to send from. Can someone help explain this please. I don't see how Zoom or similar UDP communications could work with these limitations.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions