Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: reasoning_effort parameter not available for omni model via Unify #5647

Closed
1 task done
illgitthat opened this issue Feb 4, 2025 · 0 comments
Closed
1 task done
Assignees
Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working

Comments

@illgitthat
Copy link
Contributor

illgitthat commented Feb 4, 2025

What happened?

It looks like reasoning_effort parameter should be supported, but I don't see it available when I use the o3-mini model via the Unify provider.

Model name: o3-mini@openai

Related code: https://github.com/danny-avila/LibreChat/blob/0312d4f4f479f6ffde65c6d617d380ed55d8fec5/api/app/clients/OpenAIClient.js#L108,L109

Maybe this regex just needs to be tweaked?

Relevant discussion: #5623

Steps to Reproduce

Add the following to your librechat.yml:

    # Unify
    - name: "Unify"
      apiKey: "${UNIFY_API_KEY}"
      baseURL: "https://api.unify.ai/v0/"
      models:
        default: [
          "o3-mini@openai",
          ]
        fetch: false
      titleConvo: false
      dropParams: ["stop", "user", "frequency_penalty", "presence_penalty"]
      iconURL: "https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fuegovic/lc-config-yaml/main/icons/Unify.webp"

What browsers are you seeing the problem on?

No response

Relevant log output

Screenshots

Image

Code of Conduct

  • I agree to follow this project's Code of Conduct
@illgitthat illgitthat added the 🐛 bug Something isn't working label Feb 4, 2025
@danny-avila danny-avila self-assigned this Feb 5, 2025
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Feb 6, 2025
@danny-avila danny-avila converted this issue into discussion #5677 Feb 6, 2025

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
🐛 bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants