Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Problem statement: We haven't defined Performant SSI for IoT #3

Open
evanwolf opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Problem statement: We haven't defined Performant SSI for IoT #3

evanwolf opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@evanwolf
Copy link
Contributor

evanwolf commented Feb 1, 2023

  • Can you shoehorn SSI into a device's tiny footprint? The TinyML community undertook this years' ago to squeeze machine learning models onto resource constrained devices.
  • How small a footprint?
  • We don't have measurements of the compute, memory, power, storage, or compute costs of each protocol-part in the trust stack.
  • We don't have a model that product managers or product designers or developers can use to scope how much of the stack can fit, which bits to leave out, how to configure the remain bits to preserve resources, workarounds for what doesn't fit, etc.
  • When extensions to SSI models are proposed, does anyone calculate the resource tax imposed on devices that use them and their connectivity?
  • Are there lightweight versions of, say, DIDComm that would do the job well enough?
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant