Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(Console): Lula Validation view #722

Closed
meganwolf0 opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #727
Closed

(Console): Lula Validation view #722

meganwolf0 opened this issue Oct 10, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #727
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@meganwolf0
Copy link
Collaborator

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

Currently when looking at the component-definition view, you can identify the linked validations, but can't read them. Add a view to read the validations

(#650 is the follow-on for writing to them and execution, e.g., dev validate)

Describe the solution you'd like

  • Given a list of validations in the ComponentDefinition View of lula console
  • When a keystroke is executed on a selected validation
  • Then validation is available to read

Describe alternatives you've considered

None

Additional context

None

Expected Deliverable

Readable validation text + any associated tests

@meganwolf0 meganwolf0 added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 10, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the triage Awaiting triage from the team label Oct 10, 2024
@meganwolf0
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Bumping to high priority to work before soss fusion demo

@meganwolf0 meganwolf0 self-assigned this Oct 10, 2024
@meganwolf0 meganwolf0 removed the triage Awaiting triage from the team label Oct 11, 2024
@brandtkeller brandtkeller added this to the Aligned Capabilities milestone Oct 18, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants