You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
中澤さんが学生を鞭で3人打った。ONLY 3 students
*中澤さんが彼らを鞭で3人打った。
先生が学生を鞭で3人打った。 AMBIGUOUS --- could be 3 teachers or students
先生が彼らを鞭で3人打った。 ONLY 3 teachers
So we need floating quantifiers to say the thing they modify is indefinite (or cog-status ?).
犬が7匹吠える INDEF
7匹の犬が吠える UDEF (not specified, probably more likely to be definite)
The solution is to mark the cognitive status on the index of the referential object, not just rely on (u)def_q_rel --- incidentally we can maybe get rid of all these pesky quantifiers (and add them with a fix-up rule for those who like their semantics well formed).
Thanks to 中澤 sensei.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
中澤さんが学生を鞭で3人打った。ONLY 3 students
*中澤さんが彼らを鞭で3人打った。
先生が学生を鞭で3人打った。 AMBIGUOUS --- could be 3 teachers or students
先生が彼らを鞭で3人打った。 ONLY 3 teachers
So we need floating quantifiers to say the thing they modify is indefinite (or cog-status ?).
犬が7匹吠える INDEF
7匹の犬が吠える UDEF (not specified, probably more likely to be definite)
The solution is to mark the cognitive status on the index of the referential object, not just rely on (u)def_q_rel --- incidentally we can maybe get rid of all these pesky quantifiers (and add them with a fix-up rule for those who like their semantics well formed).
Thanks to 中澤 sensei.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: