poss-lex-rule leaving COMPS underspecified

[emilymbender]

When combined with complement extraction, this gives grammars that spin:

possessum-lex-rule-1 := val-change-with-ccont-lex-rule &
[ C-CONT [ HOOK #hook,
RELS.LIST < arg12-ev-relation &
[ PRED "poss_rel",
LBL #lbl,
ARG1 #possessum,
ARG2 #possessor ] >,
HCONS.LIST < >,
ICONS.LIST < > ],
DTR.SYNSEM.LOCAL [ CAT [ HEAD.PRON -,
VAL [ SPR #spr,
SPEC #spec ] ],
CONT.HOOK #hook &
[ INDEX #possessum,
LTOP #lbl ] ],
SYNSEM.LOCAL.CAT [ POSSESSUM possessum-1,
VAL [ SPEC #spec,
SPR #spr,
COMPS.FIRST [ OPT -,
LOCAL [ CAT cat-sat &
[ HEAD +np,
VAL.SPR < > ],
CONT.HOOK.INDEX #possessor ] ] ],
HEAD noun &
[ MOD < >,
POSSESSOR nonpossessive,
INIT - ] ] ].

section=adnom-poss
poss-strat1_order=head-final
poss-strat1_mod-spec=mod
poss-strat1_mark-loc=possessum
poss-strat1_possessum-type=affix
poss-strat1_possessum-affix-agr=non-agree
poss-pron1_type=affix
poss-pron1_agr=non-agree
poss-pron1_mod-spec=mod