You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Now Higher RSEM-EVAL scores are better than lower scores. This is true despite the fact that the scores are always negative. For example, a score of -80000 is better than a score of -200000, since -80000 > -200000.
But it is not easy to understand this value/use this value.
Can a percent value be provide such as 100% for perfect and 90% for good?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Now Higher RSEM-EVAL scores are better than lower scores. This is true despite the fact that the scores are always negative. For example, a score of -80000 is better than a score of -200000, since -80000 > -200000.
But it is not easy to understand this value/use this value.
Can a percent value be provide such as 100% for perfect and 90% for good?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: