Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

should i add a figure for error rate in coding vs noncoding? #15

Open
taylorreiter opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

should i add a figure for error rate in coding vs noncoding? #15

taylorreiter opened this issue Jun 27, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@taylorreiter
Copy link
Member

We hypothesized that this was caused by sequencing error introduced into the simulated reads.
We mapped the simulated reads against the coding domain sequences from which they were derived and calculated mapping error rates.
While all reads mapped, the error rate was higher for reads that were predicted to be non-coding than those predicted to be coding (Welch Two Sample t-test, estimate = 0.00523, p < 0.001).

olga commented: Is there a figure for read error rates in coding vs noncoding?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant