You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Given this genome and the sequencing depth, are the flags provided in the documentation (below) the "right" ones to use?
For high-coverage libraries (> ~50x), do three-pass digital normalization: run normalize-by-median.py with --cutoff=20 and then run filter-abund.py with --cutoff=2. Now split out the remaining paired-end/interleaved and single-end reads using extract-paired-reads.py, and run normalize-by-median.py on the paired-end and single-end files (using --unpaired-reads) with --cutoff=5.
For low-coverage libraries (< 50x) do single-pass digital normalization: run normalize-by-median.py to --cutoff=10.
Thank you!
Warmest,
Olga
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
olgabot
changed the title
Suggested parameters for super-deeply (~2 billion reads) sequenced datasets?
Suggested parameters for super-deeply (~2 billion reads) sequenced genomes?
Aug 27, 2018
Hello! I'm following the suggested protocol for digital normalization on genomes. We are working on the Ixodes scapularis genome which is ~2GB in size, and is highly repetitive as found in previous drafts (PacBio on cell line, Illumina on tick embryos).
Given this genome and the sequencing depth, are the flags provided in the documentation (below) the "right" ones to use?
Thank you!
Warmest,
Olga
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: