Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Iterate on the check tool and dashboard to differentiate between blocking issues and advisory improvements #629

Closed
maddie-broxup opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

Iterate on the check tool and dashboard to differentiate between blocking issues and advisory improvements #629

maddie-broxup opened this issue Nov 6, 2024 · 6 comments
Assignees
@alextea @maddie-broxup

Comments

@maddie-broxup
Copy link

maddie-broxup commented Nov 6, 2024 •
edited by CharliePatterson
Loading

Context:

  • LPAs aren't submitting their data iteratively, and are waiting till it fully meets the specifications before using the check tool and submitting.
  • This is a problem because it increases the amount of time it takes for an LPA to provide useful data, rather than taking a more iterative approach.
  • Our goal is to try and change this behaviour through encouraging LPAs to submit data earlier.
  • One way of achieving this is by changing the user experience of the check tool by introducing the data quality framework, making a distinction between "blocking" and "non-blocking" issues, and encouraging LPAs to submit data if they have "non-blocking" issues.
@maddie-broxup maddie-broxup converted this from a draft issue Nov 6, 2024
@maddie-broxup
Copy link
Author

Worked with Alex and Charlie yesterday to break down this ticket - https://app.mural.co/t/mhclg2837/m/mhclg2837/1729675137913/ffe4967ea496dd930d7b232189a6afa06209f963?wid=0-1732537921904

Trying to arrange an ideation workshop

@alextea
Copy link
Contributor

alextea commented Nov 28, 2024

Workshop held 28/11/2024 https://app.mural.co/t/mhclg2837/m/mhclg2837/1732632489525/8006c6416276a772c407121c011de145920d63be

@maddie-broxup
Copy link
Author

Currently in the testing phase of these designs:

Landing page
Organisations finder
LPA Dashboard (East Herts)
Get started (Tree preservation order)
Check — choose upload method
Check — upload data
Check — checking file
Check — results (blocking issues)
Check — results (non-blocking issues)
Check — check data
Check — confirmation

@maddie-broxup
Copy link
Author

Designs currently going through usability testing. Board here: https://app.mural.co/t/mhclg2837/m/mhclg2837/1733245911849/af69bd713f1db1486d704b1ae29e98a3cef9fdf7

@alextea
Copy link
Contributor

alextea commented Jan 22, 2025

Iteration 2 based on insights from usability testing:

@alextea
Copy link
Contributor

alextea commented Jan 22, 2025

Screenshots from prototype: https://github.com/digital-land/provider-team-design-files/tree/main/Check%20flow/Iterative%20check%20flow%20Dec%202024

@alextea alextea moved this from Design, analysis, research to Done in Submit and update planning data service Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@alextea alextea

@maddie-broxup maddie-broxup

Labels
None yet
Projects
Submit and update planning data service
Status: Done
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@alextea @maddie-broxup