You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Succinctness currently is taken with respect to the number of rounds r. However, it reads more easily to talk about succinctness with respect to the chain size |C|. In particular, we want to say that the NIPoPoW proof size will be \tilde{O}(1) wrt |C| i.e. O(polylog(|C|)).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Succinctness currently is taken with respect to the number of rounds
r
. However, it reads more easily to talk about succinctness with respect to the chain size|C|
. In particular, we want to say that the NIPoPoW proof size will be\tilde{O}(1)
wrt|C|
i.e.O(polylog(|C|))
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: