You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I ran your training code of node classification by make test_phase=1 save_dir=save, but have found that the performance on the validation set is relatively low at accuracy : 0.4146, hit ratio : 0.5090, macro f1 : 0.2762, expected return : -0.0087, which seems to be much lower than the figures reported in the paper.
Is there any configurations that should be modified to reproduce your results? Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I ran your training code of node classification by make test_phase=1 save_dir=save, but have found that the performance on the validation set is relatively low at accuracy : 0.4146, hit ratio : 0.5090, macro f1 : 0.2762, expected return : -0.0087, which seems to be much lower than the figures reported in the paper.
Is there any configurations that should be modified to reproduce your results? Thank you very much!
Hello, I cannot download the stock data and Wikipedia relationship data provided in the original paper, could you please give me a copy?
Hi, thank you for your great work and code!
I ran your training code of node classification by
make test_phase=1 save_dir=save
, but have found that the performance on the validation set is relatively low at accuracy : 0.4146, hit ratio : 0.5090, macro f1 : 0.2762, expected return : -0.0087, which seems to be much lower than the figures reported in the paper.Is there any configurations that should be modified to reproduce your results? Thank you very much!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: