Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

python nanoserver image? #169

Open
StefanScherer opened this issue Jan 7, 2017 · 4 comments
Open

python nanoserver image? #169

StefanScherer opened this issue Jan 7, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
Request Request for image modification or feature

Comments

@StefanScherer
Copy link
Contributor

After golang has official images based on nanoserver, I'm looking for a python image based on microsoft/nanoserver.

I've done some first investigations in StefanScherer/dockerfiles-windows#61, but pip does not work yet as shown in https://ci.appveyor.com/project/StefanScherer/dockerfiles-windows/build/1.0.135

@tianon
Copy link
Member

tianon commented Jan 9, 2017

Nice initial work! 😄 👍

My Python-fu isn't as great as it ought to be, but that error in pip looks like more of a Python error than a pip error, right? (ie, potentially other Python applications would have the same failure?)

@LBates2000
Copy link

I took a slightly different approach that uses a 'side-loaded' full install instead of downloading and installing the embedded version. This install supports pip:

https://github.com/LBates2000/python-nanoserver-container

@StefanScherer
Copy link
Contributor Author

StefanScherer commented Jan 11, 2017

@LBates2000 Thanks you. So it proves that only some files are missing. I thought about registry keys as Python looks there, too.

@wglambert wglambert added the Request Request for image modification or feature label Apr 24, 2018
@mikedld
Copy link

mikedld commented Nov 26, 2021

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Request Request for image modification or feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants