Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RejectionException while shutting down Ebean and NotifyOfCommit should be scheduled #2565

Open
jnehlmeier opened this issue Feb 23, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@jnehlmeier
Copy link

Application server running in Docker with active docker health check sometimes causes application server to restart (memory leaks in JVM). The restart is a regular application server shutdown and not a pure kill -9. In that case Ebean will be shut down and often throw a RejectionException during some commits that might still be executed on the server.

I am wondering if that is a race condition that might need to be fixed. I could imagine the code flow is like

  1. commit()
  2. db.shutdown()
  3. notifyCommit(), which calls an already terminated scheduler causing the exception

Maybe the exception should be handled in Ebean, if it is expected to be thrown during shutdown.

ERROR i.e.s.transaction.TransactionManager 
NotifyOfCommit failed. L2 Cache potentially not notified.
java.util.concurrent.RejectedExecutionException: Task java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask@1a6dea8d[Not completed, task = java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter@370f053c[Wrapped task = io.ebeaninternal.server.executor.DefaultBackgroundExecutor$$Lambda$708/0x0000000801193800@62db3d40]] rejected from io.ebeaninternal.server.executor.DaemonScheduleThreadPool@7b14312[Terminated, pool size = 0, active threads = 0, queued tasks = 0, completed tasks = 8564]
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$AbortPolicy.rejectedExecution(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:2057)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.reject(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:827)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.delayedExecute(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:340)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.schedule(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:562)
	at java.base/java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.submit(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:715)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.executor.DefaultBackgroundExecutor.submit(DefaultBackgroundExecutor.java:75)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.executor.DefaultBackgroundExecutor.execute(DefaultBackgroundExecutor.java:80)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.transaction.TransactionManager.notifyOfCommit(TransactionManager.java:452)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.transaction.JdbcTransaction.notifyCommit(JdbcTransaction.java:934)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.transaction.JdbcTransaction.postCommit(JdbcTransaction.java:1005)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.transaction.JdbcTransaction.flushCommitAndNotify(JdbcTransaction.java:999)
	at io.ebeaninternal.server.transaction.JdbcTransaction.commit(JdbcTransaction.java:1058)
	at io.ebeaninternal.api.ScopeTrans.commitTransaction(ScopeTrans.java:140)
	at io.ebeaninternal.api.ScopedTransaction.commit(ScopedTransaction.java:110)
@rbygrave
Copy link
Member

Hmmm interesting. Ebean's database.shutdown() ought to wait for the Executor service to properly shutdown waiting for submitted requests to complete, with a max wait time. This stack trace looks more like a commit() occurring after shutdown is initiated.

@jnehlmeier
Copy link
Author

But that would mean ServletContextListeners will be executed before running requests have been completed. I'll try to check if that is the case.

@AntoineDuComptoirDesPharmacies

Hi all,

Just for information, we get the same error randomly (rare) while sending a SIGTERM to our application in docker.
Ebean was doing this error while our requests were still in-flight and server was waiting for request to finish before shutting down.

Note that our application is using Play Ebean integration in the latest version available.

Yours faithfully,
LCDP

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants