Thank you for your interest in contributing to the ESMF Aspect Model Editor. Use this repository to contribute to the Aspect Model Editor as easy and transparent as possible, whether it is:
- Reporting a bug
- Submitting a fix
- Proposing new features
- something else
The ESMF Aspect Model Editor is developed in the context of the Eclipse Semantic Modeling Framework. It is based on the Semantic Aspect Meta Model (SAMM) and supports its use.
- We use this GitHub repository to track issues and feature requests.
- For discussions specific to development, the preferred way is the developer mailing list.
Decisions on code and architecture are documented using Markdown Any Decision Records in documentation/decisions/.
We follow the Git branching guidance.
More specifically the repository has the following branches:
| name of branch | description |
|---|---|
main |
Contains the latest state of the repository |
v{version_number}-RC{rc_number} |
A "release candidate": A version that freezes major features and |
can be considered a pre-release of the next full release.
v{version_number} | A full release of the respective version.
feature/#{issue_number}-{feature_name} | Contains the development on a specific feature and is
intended to be merged back into the main branch as soon as possible. Note, that it is recommended
for contributors to create and develop feature branches in a personal fork and not the upstream
repository.
bug/#{issue_number}-{bug_name} | Contains the development of (usually smaller) changes in files of
the repository that do not introduce new functionality but fix mistakes, errors or inconsistencies.
These branches should be merged back into the mainbranch as soon as possible.
We use the Issues feature of GitHub for tracking all types of work in the repository.
We distinguish between the following types of issues;
| Issue Types | Description |
|---|---|
Bug Report |
This Issue is dedicated to reporting a problem. |
Task |
This Issue is used for describing and proposing a new work item (e.g., a new feature) |
If there are issues that link to the same topic, the creator of the issue shall mention those other tasks in the description. To group tasks that can belong together, one could further create an issue mentioning and describing the overall user story for the referenced tasks.
Proposals for changes to the content of the repository are managed through Pull Requests (PRs).
To open such a PR, implement the changes in a new feature branch. Each PR must reference an issue and follows the
naming schema: <issue-number>-<feature-name>. For a new PR the target branch is the main branch while the source
branch is your feature branch The feature branch branch should be developed in a fork of the upstream repository.
So before working on your first feature, you need to create such a fork (e.g., by pressing the Fork button in the top
right corner of the GitHub page)
When opening a PR please consider the following topics:
- optional: Rebase your development on the branch to which you plan to create the
PR. - Each
PRmust be linked to anIssue:- Reference the
Issuenumber in the name of yourfeature branchand the description of thePR. - Mention the
Issuein one of the commit messages associated to thePRtogether with a GitHub keyword likecloses #IssueNumberorfixes #IssuesNumber. For more details visit the GitHub documentation on linking PR with Issues
- Reference the
- Each
PRshould only contain changes related to a single work item. If the changes cover more than one work item or feature, then create onePRper work item. You may need to create new more specificIssuesto reference if you split up the work into multiplefeature branches. - Commit changes often. A
PRmay contain one or more commits.
This Eclipse Foundation open project is governed by the Eclipse Foundation Development Process and operates under the terms of the Eclipse IP Policy.
- https://eclipse.org/projects/dev_process
- https://www.eclipse.org/org/documents/Eclipse_IP_Policy.pdf
In order to be able to contribute to Eclipse Foundation projects you must electronically sign the Eclipse Contributor Agreement (ECA).
The ECA provides the Eclipse Foundation with a permanent record that you agree that each of your contributions will comply with the commitments documented in the Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO). Having an ECA on file associated with the email address matching the "Author" field of your contribution's Git commits fulfills the DCO's requirement that you sign-off on your contributions.
For more information, please see the Eclipse Committer Handbook: https://www.eclipse.org/projects/handbook/#resources-commit
Separate the subject from the body with a blank line because the subject line is shown in the Git history and should summarize the commit body. Use the body to explain what and why with less focus on the details of the how. This blog post has more tips and details. Before you push your commits to a repository, you should squash your commits into one or more logical units of work, e.g., you should organize a new feature in a single commit.
All files contributed require headers - this will ensure the license and copyright clearing at the end. Also, all contributions must have the same license as the source. The header should follow the following template:
/*
* Copyright (c) {YEAR} {NAME OF COMPANY X}
* Copyright (c) {YEAR} {NAME OF COMPANY Y}
*
* See the AUTHORS file(s) distributed with this work for additional
* information regarding authorship.
*
* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
* License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
* file, You can obtain one at https://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: MPL-2.0
*/
When using the template, one must replace "{NAME OF COMPANY X}" with the name of the involved companies and "{YEAR}" with the year of the contribution. For each involved company you need a new line starting with "Copyright" as outlined in the example.
The example is taken from a Java source file. If your file is of another type you may have to adapt the comment syntax accordingly.
If you use third-party content (e.g., import / include ...), you are required to list each third-party content explicitly with its version number in the documentation and your pull-request comment. Please also check used third party material for license compatibility with the MPL-2.0. E.g. software licensed under GPL, AGPL or, a similar strong copy-left license cannot be approved.
The ESMF Aspect Model Editor is written in the Java Programming Language. Please have a look into our Code Conventions.
We use Semantic Versioning to identify released versions of the ESMF Aspect Model Editor. Semantic Versioning is documented here. It proposes to have a versioning number with the following elements:
Given a version number MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH, increment the:
- MAJOR version when you make incompatible API changes,
- MINOR version when you add functionality in a backwards compatible manner, and
- PATCH version when you make backwards compatible bug fixes.
Additional labels for pre-release and build metadata are available as extensions to the MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH format.
Whereas the Major version must be incremented if the API has backward-incompatible changes (e.g., has breaking changes), the Minor version must be changed if new backward-compatible features are introduced and, the Patch version must be incremented if backward-compatible bugfixes are introduced.
For the definition of a breaking change, we follow the definition as in the Microsoft REST API Guidelines which are licensed under CC-BY-4.0. This definition states:
Changes to the contract of an API are considered a breaking change. Changes that impact the backwards compatibility
of an API are a breaking change.
Git version tag
vX.Y.Z-[pre-release-identifier]
Examples:
v1.0.0-RC1, v1.0.0