From cef13e34f5b1e262fb07bce0849b0b2457473dc2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Theresa Mammarella <Theresa.T.Mammarella@ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:11:34 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Missing null-restricted flag in MethodHandles initialization

Signed-off-by: Theresa Mammarella <Theresa.T.Mammarella@ibm.com>
---
 runtime/jcl/common/java_lang_invoke_MethodHandleNatives.cpp | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/runtime/jcl/common/java_lang_invoke_MethodHandleNatives.cpp b/runtime/jcl/common/java_lang_invoke_MethodHandleNatives.cpp
index 37aa44ada23..1ae5769d6fe 100644
--- a/runtime/jcl/common/java_lang_invoke_MethodHandleNatives.cpp
+++ b/runtime/jcl/common/java_lang_invoke_MethodHandleNatives.cpp
@@ -210,6 +210,7 @@ initImpl(J9VMThread *currentThread, j9object_t membernameObject, j9object_t refO
 		}
 #if defined(J9VM_OPT_VALHALLA_FLATTENABLE_VALUE_TYPES)
 		if (J9ROMFIELD_IS_NULL_RESTRICTED(romField)) {
+			flags |= MN_NULL_RESTRICTED;
 			if (vmFuncs->isFlattenableFieldFlattened(fieldID->declaringClass, fieldID->field)) {
 				flags |= MN_FLAT_FIELD;
 			}