Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[R25.06] Logistic and Customs: KIT Maintenance #1167

Open
17 tasks
klanir123 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
17 tasks

[R25.06] Logistic and Customs: KIT Maintenance #1167

klanir123 opened this issue Jan 23, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
kit RM KIT definition Prep-R25.06 traceability Feature/Bug for Traceability KIT
Milestone

Comments

@klanir123
Copy link

Overview

Explain the topic in 2 sentences

This features ensures enhancements to customs (e.g. usage of digital signature) and KIT Maintenance activities. This also include potential bug fixes from previous Releases.
A new version of the Aspect model CustomsInformation will be referenced with this new release.

What's the benefit?

Ensure proper Logistic and Customs KIT representation.
Details to facilitate the implementation of the use case

What are the Risks/Dependencies ?

None

Detailed explanation

With the new release, the customs use cases will be detailed in order to facilitate implementation by interested companies. Furthermore, the documentation will also be expanded again on the topic of digital signatures, which is a requirement in this use case. Furthermore, a new version of the Aspect model CustomsInformation will be referenced with the new release.

Feature Team

Contributor

  • Klaus Nirschl
  • Corina Stolz

Committer

@Grand-Thibault

Acceptance Criteria

  • Initial PR
  • Final PR

Architectural Relevance

The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented.

In the context of the standards 126 and 127, typically only one is applicable, depending on the specific use case. Please cross out one of the two standards that does not apply.

Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)

@klanir123 klanir123 self-assigned this Jan 23, 2025
@klanir123 klanir123 added kit RM KIT definition traceability Feature/Bug for Traceability KIT Prep-R25.06 labels Jan 23, 2025
@ther3sa ther3sa added this to the 25.06 milestone Jan 24, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kit RM KIT definition Prep-R25.06 traceability Feature/Bug for Traceability KIT
Projects
Status: Inbox
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants