-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[TRACE-X] 🌟🚀Trace-X Data Provisioning used digitalTwinType for register assets the dtr #940
Open
1 of 14 tasks
Labels
ic
represents features/dependencies to the industry core
Prep-R25.03
trace-x
Feature/Bug for Trace-x component
Milestone
Comments
Some hints from Release Management (@ther3sa) and Tractus-X Project Lead (@stephanbcbauer)
|
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
eclipse-tractusx/sig-release#940 Co-authored-by: maciej.kizlich <[email protected]>
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
2 tasks
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
…or register assets the dtr" This reverts commit 1588186.
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 9, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
ds-lcapellino
added a commit
to Cofinity-X/entry-traceability-foss
that referenced
this issue
Jan 13, 2025
…ter assets the dtr
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
ic
represents features/dependencies to the industry core
Prep-R25.03
trace-x
Feature/Bug for Trace-x component
Overview
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
The objective of this issue is to ensure that the Trace-X application complies with IndustryCore 2.0.0 standards by including the specialAssetId "digitalTwinType" in its data provisioning. This will enable Trace-X to manage digital twins in a manner aligned with industry standards for interoperability and data exchange.
What's the benefit?
Introducing the "digitalTwinType" specialAssetId ensures that the Trace-X application is fully compatible with IndustryCore 2.0.0 standards, promoting better interoperability and streamlined data management for digital twins. This upgrade will make the system more aligned with the latest industry guidelines, improving its ability to participate in broader data ecosystems.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
One potential risk is ensuring backward compatibility with existing dtrs that might not yet support or require the "digitalTwinType" specialAssetId. Additionally, dependencies on other systems or data sources need to be assessed to ensure that they can handle this new field correctly without disrupting current workflows or causing integration issues.
Detailed explanation
Current implementation
Currently, the Trace-X system does not incorporate the specialAssetId "digitalTwinType" into its data provisioning process. This omission means it is not fully compliant with IndustryCore 2.0.0 standards, which require this field for proper digital twin identification and handling.
Proposed improvements
The proposed enhancement involves adding the "digitalTwinType" specialAssetId to the data provisioning process in Trace-X, ensuring compliance with IndustryCore 2.0.0. This change will ensure that digital twins are correctly tagged with this identifier, allowing for better alignment with industry-standard practices.
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Story
As a product with indents to be IndustryCore 2.0.0 conform
I want to provide the specialAssetId “digitalTwinType”
so that the data provisioning is industry core compatible
Acceptance Critiera
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Expected Result
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: