-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[IRS]🌟🚀 Enhancing IRS Scalability to meet required Quantity Model #951
Labels
Comments
Some hints from Release Management (@ther3sa) and Tractus-X Project Lead (@stephanbcbauer)
|
Feature is moved from r25.3 to 25.6 due to other priorities. |
I deleted the milestone, since the milestone is set together in the open planning session. This means ⇾ commitment to work on the feature. THX |
was not presented in open planning. Nobody was available. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Overview
Explain the topic in 2 sentences
IRS is enhanced to achieve scalability according to the required quantity model The objective is to modify the application architecture and infrastructure to handle an increased volume of data, transactions, (and user interactions efficiently), without compromising performance, availability, or reliability.
What's the benefit?
This change increases the efficiency and scalability of IRS by allowing it to handle more transactions and data volume, thus meeting future demand. It also reduces the complexity by identifying and addressing system bottlenecks and optimizing shared components.
What are the Risks/Dependencies ?
Detailed explanation
Evaluation of limitations of used shared services
Current implementation
Proposed improvements
Feature Team
Contributor
Committer
User Stories
Acceptance Criteria
Scalability Performance:
Dynamic Scaling:
Seamless Integration with Shared Components:
Test Cases
Test Case 1
Steps
Expected Result
Architectural Relevance
The following items are ensured (answer: yes) after this issue is implemented:
Justification: (Fill this out, if at least one of the checkboxes above cannot be ticked. Contact the Architecture Management Committee to get an approval for the justification)
Additional information
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: