You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see your note that deleting item is sure that the deleted item must be the filter.
May I ask if the principle of a cuckoo filter requires the deleted element to be included in the filter when deleting elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It depends upon usage, but I think cuckoofilters typically preserve the whole original key inside the entry, with which they avoids removing a collision. In principle, you only need derived key parts, so then remove risks removing a collision incorrectly, due to hash collisions. I doubt anyone uses cryptographic hashes, like 128 or really 256 bits, but those avoid collisions without storing the original key of course.
I see your note that deleting item is sure that the deleted item must be the filter.
May I ask if the principle of a cuckoo filter requires the deleted element to be included in the filter when deleting elements?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: