You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be nice to be able to specify the outer wall thickness when creating the standard (non-adapter) movement tray types. As it is, the wall thickness is a byproduct of the slope from the bottom vertices to the top ones, which makes it difficult to tweak independently — and the default is much thinner than a GW movement tray, for example, if you're trying to match the look across your army between printed and non-printed trays.
I couldn't figure this out myself, but if you're open to enhancement requests this would be pretty neat ✌️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It would be nice to be able to specify the outer wall thickness when creating the standard (non-adapter) movement tray types. As it is, the wall thickness is a byproduct of the slope from the bottom vertices to the top ones, which makes it difficult to tweak independently — and the default is much thinner than a GW movement tray, for example, if you're trying to match the look across your army between printed and non-printed trays.
I couldn't figure this out myself, but if you're open to enhancement requests this would be pretty neat ✌️
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: