Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ci(fix): osv-scanner PR mode #5174

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025
Merged

ci(fix): osv-scanner PR mode #5174

merged 2 commits into from
Jan 30, 2025

Conversation

shahar-h
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:
osv-scanner-reusable-pr.yml should be called when workflow is triggered from PR so scan will fail only if new vulnerabilities were introduced. It was renamed by accident to osv-scanner-reusable.yml here.

Release Notes: No

@shahar-h shahar-h requested a review from a team as a code owner January 30, 2025 07:54
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 66.90%. Comparing base (45804e2) to head (fe8c337).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5174   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   66.89%   66.90%           
=======================================
  Files         210      210           
  Lines       32979    32979           
=======================================
+ Hits        22061    22063    +2     
+ Misses       9583     9581    -2     
  Partials     1335     1335           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@shahar-h
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@shahar-h shahar-h changed the title fix: osv-scanner PR mode ci(fix): osv-scanner PR mode Jan 30, 2025
@guydc guydc merged commit e904d3f into envoyproxy:main Jan 30, 2025
24 of 25 checks passed
@shahar-h shahar-h deleted the patch-1 branch January 30, 2025 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants