Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(re-)visit and consider using PEP/PEPkit #26

Open
sreichl opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

(re-)visit and consider using PEP/PEPkit #26

sreichl opened this issue Sep 26, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@sreichl
Copy link
Collaborator

sreichl commented Sep 26, 2024

https://pep.databio.org/peppy/

  • (re-)visit and consider using PEP/PEPkit format for config and annotation by N Sheffield (Snakemake natively supports it)
    • https://pep.databio.org/
    • does it solve a problem I have? or introduce more problems?
    • How stable and common?
    • What would work better/smoother if I switch?
    • Applicable also for all downstream modules or only classic pipelines?
@sreichl sreichl self-assigned this Sep 26, 2024
@sreichl sreichl added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant