Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Solana] Request to update dependencies to latest versions as conflicting with other packages/plugins #1655

Open
kishangohel opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 8 comments
Labels

Comments

@kishangohel
Copy link

No description provided.

@ookami-kb
Copy link
Collaborator

Hey @kishangohel what conflicts exactly do you mean?

@kishangohel
Copy link
Author

@ookami-kb Here is exact conflict error
Because no versions of solana match >0.31.0+1 <0.32.0 and solana 0.31.0+1 depends on cryptography ^2.5.0, solana ^0.31.0+1 requires cryptography ^2.5.0.
Because cryptography >=2.6.0 depends on js ^0.6.7 and cryptography >=2.1.0 <2.6.0 depends on js ^0.6.2, cryptography >=2.1.0 requires js ^0.6.2

@ookami-kb
Copy link
Collaborator

@kishangohel can you send full error log? The one you've posted shouldn't prevent from installing, the versions are compatible.

@kishangohel
Copy link
Author

Because no versions of solana match >0.31.0+1 <0.32.0 and solana 0.31.0+1 depends on cryptography ^2.5.0, solana ^0.31.0+1 requires cryptography ^2.5.0.
Because cryptography >=2.6.0 depends on js ^0.6.7 and cryptography >=2.1.0 <2.6.0 depends on js ^0.6.2, cryptography >=2.1.0 requires js ^0.6.2.
Thus, solana ^0.31.0+1 requires js ^0.6.2.
And because amplitude_flutter >=3.16.5 <4.0.0-beta.1 depends on js ^0.7.0, solana ^0.31.0+1 is incompatible with amplitude_flutter >=3.16.5 <4.0.0-beta.1.

@ookami-kb here is full log
I have

@ookami-kb
Copy link
Collaborator

I see. Well, the problem here is in cryptography package, it doesn't have any version with newer js dependency. But looks like that project is not maintained anymore, so we need to think about switching to some other package.

@daohall
Copy link

daohall commented Jan 17, 2025

I think cryptography_plus could be the direct replacement for cryptography package. It was fork from it and maintained more actively.

@kishangohel
Copy link
Author

@ookami-kb are you planning to provide updates?

@ookami-kb
Copy link
Collaborator

Yes, will look into it later this week.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants