Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add EIP: BLOB Data and Rollup Operator Rewards #8993

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

khajievN
Copy link

ATTENTION: ERC-RELATED PULL REQUESTS NOW OCCUR IN ETHEREUM/ERCS

--

When opening a pull request to submit a new EIP, please use the suggested template: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/blob/master/eip-template.md

We have a GitHub bot that automatically merges some PRs. It will merge yours immediately if certain criteria are met:

  • The PR edits only existing draft PRs.
  • The build passes.
  • Your GitHub username or email address is listed in the 'author' header of all affected PRs, inside .
  • If matching on email address, the email address is the one publicly listed on your GitHub profile.

@eth-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eth-bot commented Oct 23, 2024

File EIPS/eip-00000.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @gcolvin, @lightclient, @SamWilsn

@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus label Oct 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added c-new Creates a brand new proposal s-draft This EIP is a Draft w-ci Waiting on CI to pass labels Oct 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Oct 23, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot added the e-review Waiting on editor to review label Oct 23, 2024
@eth-bot eth-bot changed the title A proposal to reward rollup operators for submitting BLOB data to L1 Add EIP: BLOB Data and Rollup Operator Rewards Oct 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Oct 23, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Oct 23, 2024
@nerolation
Copy link
Contributor

This is spam.

EIPS/eip-7570.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@abcoathup
Copy link
Contributor

This doesn't appear to be an EIP (in its current form)

Rollups are already using blobs, with the incentive that it is generally cheaper than calldata: https://www.growthepie.xyz/economics

Co-authored-by: Andrew B Coathup <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Oct 24, 2024
@sopia19910
Copy link

Hello,

Ethereum has adopted layer technology, where L2 is connected to the Ethereum blockchain with finality at lower fees. This means that L2 blocks are also recognized as part of the Ethereum blockchain.

In other words, Layer 2 is part of the Ethereum blockchain, and I believe that this scalability should extend not only to blocks but also to validators and the reward system. However, the current focus is solely on block expansion, which has led to the perception that Ethereum is becoming centralized.

Therefore, I believe that if the validator and reward systems are also expanded, Ethereum would not be considered centralized.

To address this issue, our team has made a proposal, and we plan to continue suggesting specific code modifications to support this.

To clarify what we are proposing: ultimately, we are suggesting not just providing rewards to operators who perform rollups, but also creating a system where the consensus algorithm of L2 chains interacts with L1 and receives rewards based on that interaction. We will further elaborate on this in more detail.

Copy link

The commit dbbf917 (as a parent of dd6f693) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci Waiting on CI to pass label Oct 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c-new Creates a brand new proposal e-consensus Waiting on editor consensus e-review Waiting on editor to review s-draft This EIP is a Draft t-core
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants