feat!: Default all loaders and mutators to enforcing

[wschurman]

Why

Note: this should probably be released as a new major version, which is 1.0.0 (!).

This addresses the comment on #253:

it'd be a good idea to push out a breaking change to Entity where everything is enforcing by default and you need to call unenforcing() (or withAuthorizationResults())

The reason this is possible now is that after the breaking change from that PR, it is a typescript error breaking change instead of an implicit breaking change to default the loaders/mutations to the enforcing versions.

How

The new CRUD interface for entity will look like:

await TestEntity.creator(vc).setField(...).createAsync();
await TestEntity.creatorWithAuthorizationResults(vc).setField(...).updateAsync();

await TestEntity.updater(entity).setField(...).createAsync();
await TestEntity.updaterWithAuthorizationResults(entity).setField(...).updateAsync();

await TestEntity.deleter(entity).deleteAsync();
await TestEntity.deleterWithAuthorizationResults(entity).deleteAsync();

await TestEntity.loader(vc).getByIDAsync(id);
await TestEntity.loaderWithAuthorizationResults(vc).getByIDAsync(id);

await entity.associationLoader().loadAssociatedEntityAsync(...);
await entity.associationLoaderWithAuthorizationResults().loadAssociatedEntityAsync(...);

Test Plan

Full test coverage.

[wschurman]

• feat: Create codemod for v0.40.0 -> v1.0.0 #260
• feat!: Default all loaders and mutators to enforcing #256 👈 (View in Graphite)
• feat: Create codemod for v0.39.0 -> v0.40.0 #259
• feat!: Add enforcing entity association loader #257
• chore: add CI check for needing to run ctix #258
• chore: switch barreling to ctix #255
• chore: internal refactor of loader to be structured like new mutation methods #254
• feat!: Make load/create/update/delete entity authorization result interfaces consistent #253
• chore: upgrade typescript and related packages #252
• main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d63ddd6) to head (d3a4a60).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #256   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           80        80           
  Lines         2053      2070   +17     
  Branches       277       282    +5     
=========================================
+ Hits          2053      2070   +17     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
unittest	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[wschurman]

Will land this once v0.40.0 is stabilized and has been out for a little while. Will also write a codemod in the @expo/entity-codemod package added in #259.