You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Over the last year, I have come to accept that the sl CLI command now refers to the sapling binary, and the steam locomotive command is mostly relegated to being an old legend in unix history.
Still, it would be nice to be able to look at the old choo choo train sometime. Could we add it to sapling, as an homage to its command line ancestor? The sapling binary is some 50mb today, while 🚂 is hardly some 10s of kilobytes, so binary size shouldn't be a concern.
What should the subcommand be?
My initial suggestion was sl sl, but that is sadly taken by the smart log
sl ls is a tribute to the original sl command being a typo for ls
sl steamlocomotive is nice and explicit
sl 🚂 if we're okay with unicode
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Over the last year, I have come to accept that the
sl
CLI command now refers to the sapling binary, and the steam locomotive command is mostly relegated to being an old legend in unix history.Still, it would be nice to be able to look at the old choo choo train sometime. Could we add it to sapling, as an homage to its command line ancestor? The sapling binary is some 50mb today, while 🚂 is hardly some 10s of kilobytes, so binary size shouldn't be a concern.
What should the subcommand be?
sl sl
, but that is sadly taken by the smart logsl ls
is a tribute to the originalsl
command being a typo forls
sl steamlocomotive
is nice and explicitsl 🚂
if we're okay with unicodeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: