Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find an elegant way to use DTDResponse in types.dart #6996

Closed
CoderDake opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Find an elegant way to use DTDResponse in types.dart #6996

CoderDake opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
needs-more-details Issues that need more details before they can be triaged P3 issues we think are valid but not important reproduce to verify Issues that need to be reproduced to verify that they still exist.

Comments

@CoderDake
Copy link
Contributor

CoderDake commented Dec 20, 2023

https://dart-review.googlesource.com/c/sdk/+/342980/4/pkg/dtd/lib/src/dtd_file_system_access/types.dart

The original design said to extend the response, but it seemed to make it more cumbersome.Talk to Ben to see how we can better do this.

@CoderDake CoderDake self-assigned this Dec 20, 2023
@kenzieschmoll
Copy link
Member

nit: this should be tracked on the dart-lang/ repo

@kenzieschmoll kenzieschmoll added P3 issues we think are valid but not important reproduce to verify Issues that need to be reproduced to verify that they still exist. needs-more-details Issues that need more details before they can be triaged labels Jul 17, 2024
@kenzieschmoll
Copy link
Member

Moved to the SDK dart-lang/sdk#56997

@kenzieschmoll kenzieschmoll closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 30, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
needs-more-details Issues that need more details before they can be triaged P3 issues we think are valid but not important reproduce to verify Issues that need to be reproduced to verify that they still exist.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants