Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Changing some initial ResponsiveScaffold Properties #30

Open
Ronjack opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Changing some initial ResponsiveScaffold Properties #30

Ronjack opened this issue Mar 2, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@Ronjack
Copy link

Ronjack commented Mar 2, 2021

Hey, I am working with your responsive_scaffold and its a good solution make the app crossplattform compatible and more responsibe.

I am now on the point where the responsive_scaffold facing its limits.

Generally its adaptive to many cases.

But regarding to the appbar its a bit impractical. You can only overgive the title and actions to adjust this,
But what if i want use crossplatorm backbuttons and using the bottom functionality of the appbar for example for tab views? --> I need to build my appbar on my own.

i have some ideas regarding to the responsive scaffold:

  • So i think its more useful if title and trailing + appbar specific stuff will be removed.
  • floatingActionButtons are bound to the bottom of the scaffold body, but why not to the scaffolds floating action button properties?

In my opinion the responsive_scaffold is just a container which gives 100% controle over the scaffold but enables the power to makes the scaffold responsible regarding to the device(so what its doing atm).

What do you think about it? Correct me if I am wrong.

And I wonder why no more people use this package, bec responsiblitie is a main theme in flutter?!?!

Thank you for this package btw! Good work.

Best regards from germany,

Robin

image

@Leptopoda
Copy link

And I wonder why no more people use this package, bec responsiblitie is a main theme in flutter?!?!
Probably as it sometimes has limits and building one yourself isn't that hard xD

regarding your request coul'd you elaborate more?
I just don't get what exactly you mean
(I'm not the maintainer but started a fork for my own use and maybe I'll request taking over this project)

grüße zurück I guess

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants