You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to use the new batch upload API. It's way faster and the result is much more human friendly. But we are stuck using the --legacy API, because if you run without the --legacy flag, then it creates a duplicate data library.
Having a period of time with a duplicate (or with no) data library is not ideal.
Could the batch upload API update a data library rather than producing a new data lib?
Otherwise, could we get the nicer short names in the --legacy api?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
and
behave quite differently.
I want to use the new batch upload API. It's way faster and the result is much more human friendly. But we are stuck using the
--legacy
API, because if you run without the--legacy
flag, then it creates a duplicate data library.Having a period of time with a duplicate (or with no) data library is not ideal.
--legacy
api?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: