- Author: @refugeesus
- Start Date: November 11, 2020
- Category: Technical
- Tracking Issue: #78
- Status: Closed
The goals of these changes are to:
- Break up the PoC message to improve the reliability of PoC transmissions.
- Improve the quality of information gained from PoC transmissions in the RF layer.
The link layer is the method by which information is send from one source to another. It sits directly above the PHY layer and below the MAC layer. For a specific definition, please see the OSI model.
In our current implementation the link layer is extremely simple. We encode and transmit a single PoC payload with no redundancy or any additional correction applied. We have an issue right now that a PoC packet is not very resistant to noise or collision. Additionally, and more importantly, sending one packet with one signal reading infrequently (say twice a day) is not very descriptive. We are looking to better describe coverage quality, and a series of smaller packets to describe a larger payload will let us better know how strong a link is between many Hotspots even if we are technically PoC'ing twice a day or so.
- Hotspot owners
- Network users
- 3rd party Hotspot manufacturers
- DIY miners
The PoC link layer should attempt to provide reliable transmissions of data without requiring high error correction overhead or the need for numerous packet re-transmissions or acknowledgments. To accomplish this, the first step in transmitting a message is creating fountain generator from the encrypted source payload. Next, the fountain generator produces small, fixed size packets, or "droplets", which are LDPC (low-density parity check) encoded. Combining the two methods provides block erasure and bit level error correction for transmissions in a noisy channel. Additionally, the entire message will be received without re-transmissions so long as the link remains active. A bit error rate and connection quality can be derived by the receiver through the decoding of each LDPC encoded droplet, and calculating the overhead of droplets needed to receive the message relative to the distribution used to generate droplets. If this is a standard distribution over the data, the mean would be 1.5 times the minimum payload size.
The general implementation of the LDPC-LT encoding an decoding method requires, known, shared LDPC encoding techniques, a sudo-random block creation technique based on a normal probability distribution, and a decoding buffer to attempt decoding payloads as the receive buffers are filled via Gaussian reduction.
To begin, the Challengee braodcasts the PoC message stream and waits for a response from any gateways in range, expiring on a percentage of expected witnesses acknowledging recovery of the payload. The transmit sequence by a gateway involves it transmitting droplets continuously until it receives a single N/ACK from a gateway indicating the entire message was received correctly or not. An alternative to the N/ACK requirement could be to implement an expiry window. The expiry window could align with a reasonable percentage overhead (200% - 250%).
- This method does require more spectrum utilization but at low impact to our regulatory ceiling.
- Implementing a noise resistant link layer is critical to succssful PoC transmissions in increasingly crowded or lossy environments. We will additionally be capable of increasing the data rate and lowering time on air without sacrificing sensitivity. The advantage of a builtin BER test gives us an accurate measure of link quality truely descriptive of a connection between two discrete devices which we have no other method of determining with any accuracy currently. RSSI and SNR alone for a single transmission sporadically over a day or days is far too low frequency to establish quality of a link, and network adopters should rightly question/doubt any claim of assumed coverage.
- Quantity and distribution of rewards is considered out of scope for this HIP.
- Deployment of this system will have a direct impact on current Hotspot deployments, increasing number of transmissions during PoC.
What metrics can be used to measure the success of this design?
- Successful PoC transmissions should increase with additional reports of BER.
1. (LT) Fountain Code Fountain codes are rate-less erasure codes, encoding an undefined sequence of information into an unlimited number of encoded symbols which can be recovered from any subset of encoded symbols greater than or equal to the source information. The encoded symbol creation is based on a known distribution and random seed, which the receiver uses to iteratively decode collected samples.
2. LDPC Coding Low density parity check coding is a linear error correcting code utilizing a (sparse) parity-check matrix, ideally constructed to be optimal for the data to be transmitted.
These are a series of test results from Random and Systematic fountain encoders/decoders using both MinSum and BitFlipping LDPC decoders. Subtract 100 from the overhead number to get the actual overhead sent over the air as the LDPC encoder implicitly doubles the size of the outgoing payload. There are verying degrees of loss, with Systematic encoders/decoders clearly outperforming any other option which is the expected behavior.
running 8 tests
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.05 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 0 | Total: 10 | Percentage: 0.0
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.1 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 0 | Total: 10 | Percentage: 0.0
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.0 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 0 | Total: 10 | Percentage: 0.0
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_systematic_minsum ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.05 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 1 | Total: 11 | Percentage: 0.09090909
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 22, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 220.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.05 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 1 | Total: 23 | Percentage: 0.04347826
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 17, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 170.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.2 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 2 | Total: 19 | Percentage: 0.10526316
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 16, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 160.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.1 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 1 | Total: 17 | Percentage: 0.05882353
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 18, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 180.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.1 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 5 | Total: 23 | Percentage: 0.2173913
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 18, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 180.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.25 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 5 | Total: 23 | Percentage: 0.2173913
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 14, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 140.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.3 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 2 | Total: 16 | Percentage: 0.125
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 16, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 160.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.2 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 2 | Total: 18 | Percentage: 0.11111111
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 26, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 260.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.2 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 5 | Total: 31 | Percentage: 0.16129032
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 19, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 190.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.5 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 18 | Total: 37 | Percentage: 0.4864865
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 16, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 160.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.25 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 4 | Total: 20 | Percentage: 0.2
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 20, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 200.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.25 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 9 | Total: 29 | Percentage: 0.31034482
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.3 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 7 | Total: 17 | Percentage: 0.4117647
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 57, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 570.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.0 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 0 | Total: 57 | Percentage: 0.0
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_random_minsum ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 53, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 530.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.3 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 24 | Total: 77 | Percentage: 0.3116883
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 38, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 380.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.5 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 50 | Total: 88 | Percentage: 0.5681818
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 32, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 320.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.9 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 273 | Total: 305 | Percentage: 0.895082
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_systematic_lossy ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 194, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 181.30841, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.1 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 17 | Total: 211 | Percentage: 0.08056872
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_systematic ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 21, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 210.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.5 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 22 | Total: 43 | Percentage: 0.5116279
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 24, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 240.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.9 | EncodeType: SysLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 162 | Total: 186 | Percentage: 0.87096775
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_systematic_lossy_minsum ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 34, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 340.0, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.9 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 236 | Total: 270 | Percentage: 0.8740741
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_random_lossy ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 488, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 456.07477, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.0 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Bf | Lost: 0 | Total: 488 | Percentage: 0.0
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_random ... ok
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 480, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 448.59814, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.05 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 15 | Total: 495 | Percentage: 0.030303031
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 550, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 514.0187, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.1 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 68 | Total: 618 | Percentage: 0.110032365
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 644, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 601.86914, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.2 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 169 | Total: 813 | Percentage: 0.20787208
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 486, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 454.2056, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.25 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 191 | Total: 677 | Percentage: 0.28212702
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 441, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 412.14954, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.3 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 198 | Total: 639 | Percentage: 0.30985916
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 406, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 379.43924, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.5 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 370 | Total: 776 | Percentage: 0.47680414
Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 643, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 600.9346, unknown_chunks: 0 } | Loss: 0.9 | EncodeType: RandLdpc(TC512, 0) | Decoder Type: Ms | Lost: 5624 | Total: 6267 | Percentage: 0.89739907
test ldpc_test_enc_dec_random_lossy_minsum ... oklistening on: 127.0.0.1:8080
Make new decoder bucket ID: 1 | BufLen: 311
Make new decoder bucket ID: 3 | BufLen: 681
Make new decoder bucket ID: 2 | BufLen: 3414
Stream: 1 | Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 10, cnt_chunks: 10, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 }
" `That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,\' said the Cat.\n\n`I don\'t much care where--\' said Alice.\n\n`Then it doesn\'t matter which way you go,\' said the Cat.\n\n`--so long as I get somewhere,\' Alice added as an explanation.\n\n`Oh, you\'re sure to do that,\' said the Cat, `if you only walk long enough.\'\n"
Stream: 2 | Status: working
Stream: 1 | Status: complete
Stream: 3 | Status: working
Stream: 3 | Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 22, cnt_chunks: 22, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 }
" `Well! I\'ve often seen a cat without a grin,\' thought Alice; `but a grin without a cat! It\'s the most curious thing I ever saw in my life!\'\n\nShe had not gone much farther before she came in sight of the house of the March Hare: she thought it must be the right house, because the chimneys were shaped like ears and the roof was thatched with fur. It was so large a house, that she did not like to go nearer till she had nibbled some more of the lefthand bit of mushroom, and raised herself to about two feet high: even then she walked up towards it rather timidly, saying to herself `Suppose it should be raving mad after all! I almost wish I\'d gone to see the Hatter instead!\' \n"
Stream: 2 | Status: working
Stream: 1 | Status: complete
Stream: 3 | Status: complete
Stream: 2 | Success: Statistics { cnt_droplets: 107, cnt_chunks: 107, overhead: 100.0, unknown_chunks: 0 }
" `That depends a good deal on where you want to get to,\' said the Cat.\n\n`I don\'t much care where--\' said Alice.\n\n`Then it doesn\'t matter which way you go,\' said the Cat.\n\n`--so long as I get somewhere,\' Alice added as an explanation.\n\n`Oh, you\'re sure to do that,\' said the Cat, `if you only walk long enough.\'\n\nAlice felt that this could not be denied, so she tried another question. `What sort of people live about here?\'\n\n`In that direction,\' the
Cat said, waving its right paw round, `lives a Hatter: and in that direction,\' waving the other paw, `lives a March Hare. Visit either you like: they\'re both mad.\'\n\n`But I don\'t want to go among mad people,\' Alice remarked.\n\n`Oh, you can\'t help that,\' said the Cat: `we\'re all mad here. I\'m mad. You\'re mad.\'\n\n`How do you know I\'m mad?\' said Alice.\n\n`You must be,\' said the Cat, `or you wouldn\'t have come here.\'\n\nAlice didn\'t think that proved it at all; however, she went on `And how do you know that you\'re mad?\'\n\n`To begin with,\' said the Cat, `a dog\'s not mad. You grant that?\'\n\n`I suppose so,\' said Alice.\n\n`Well, then,\' the Cat went on, `you see, a dog growls when it\'s angry, and wags its tail when it\'s pleased. Now I growl when I\'m pleased, and wag my tail when I\'m angry. Therefore I\'m mad.\'\n\n`I call it purring, not growling,\' said Alice.\n\n`Call it what you like,\' said the Cat. `Do you play croquet with the Queen to-day?\'\n\n`I should like it very much,\' said Alice, `but I haven\'t been invited yet.\'\n\n`You\'ll see me there,\' said the Cat, and vanished.\n\nAlice was not much surprised at this, she was getting so used to queer things happening. While she was looking at the place where it had been, it suddenly appeared again.\n\n`By-the-bye, what became of the baby?\' said the Cat. `I\'d nearly forgotten to ask.\'\n\n`It turned into a pig,\' Alice quietly said, just as if it had come back in a natural way.\n\n`I thought it would,\' said the Cat, and vanished again.\n\nAlice waited a little, half expecting to see it again, but it did not appear, and after a minute or two she walked on in the direction in which the March Hare was said to live. `I\'ve seen hatters before,\' she said to herself; `the March Hare will be much the most interesting, and perhaps as this is May it won\'t be raving mad--at least not so mad as it was in March.\' As she said this, she looked up, and there was the Cat again, sitting on a branch of a tree.\n\n`Did you say pig, or fig?\' said the Cat.\n\n`I said pig,\' replied Alice; `and I wish you wouldn\'t keep appearing
and vanishing so suddenly: you make one quite giddy.\'\n\n`All right,\' said the Cat; and this time it vanished quite slowly, beginning with the end of the tail, and ending with the grin, which remained some time after the rest of it had gone.\n\n`Well! I\'ve often seen a cat without a grin,\' thought Alice; `but a grin without a cat! It\'s the most curious thing I ever saw in my life!\'\n\nShe had not gone much farther before she came in sight of the house of the March Hare: she thought it must be the right house, because the chimneys were shaped like ears and the roof was thatched with fur. It was so large a house, that she did not like to go nearer till she had nibbled some more of the lefthand bit
of mushroom, and raised herself to about two feet high: even then she walked up towards it rather timidly, saying to herself `Suppose it should be raving mad after all! I almost wish I\'d gone to see the Hatter instead!\'\n"
Stream: 2 | Status: complete
Stream: 1 | Status: complete
Stream: 3 | Status: complete