Hi collaborator!
We use pull request based approach to development.
Have a fix or a new feature? Search for corresponding issues first then create a new one.
If you have a new API proposal or change, create an issue describing it precisely:
- JavaScript example
- Resulting DOM/effect
Here's an example: New widget: hitsPerPageSelector (#331).
Most of our work should be based on issues. So that we are sure to have at least two or three people that agreed we needed to change something.
Then, when you are ready:
- assign the issue to yourself, change the label to
in progress
. You can use the waffle.io board. - create a branch starting from the develop branch, name it like feat/blabla, fix/blabla, refactor/blabla
- see the development workflow
- use our commit message guidelines to provide a meaningful commit message: it will be inserted into the changelog automatically
- add a #fix #issue when relevant, in the commit body
- submit your pull request to the develop branch
- Add either
do not merge
orready for review
labels given your context - wait for review
- do the necessary changes and add more commits
- once you are done, squash your commits to avoid things like "fix dangling comma in bro.js", "fix after review"
- example:
feat(widget): new feature blabla..
refactor new feature blablabla...
(bad, not following our commit message guidelines
- *both commits should be squashed in a single commit:
feat(widget) ..
- example:
- when updating your feature branch on develop, always use rebase instead of merge
Once the fix is done, having the fix in develop
is not sufficient, it needs to be part of a release for us to close the issue.
So that you never ask yourself "Is this released?".
Instead of closing the issue, you can just add the ✔ to be released
label.
Join our waffle.io board!
Rapidly iterate with our example app:
npm install
npm run dev
Run the tests and lint:
npm test
npm install package --save[-dev]
npm run shrinkwrap
npm remove package --save[-dev]
npm run shrinkwrap
We use conventional changelog to generate our changelog from our git commit messages.
Some examples:
- feat(rangeSlider): add new range option to the rangeSlider
- fix(refinementList): send the full algolia result to the noResults template
Here are the rules to write commit messages, they are the same than angular/angular.js.
Each commit message consists of a header, a body and a footer. The header has a special format that includes a type, a scope and a subject:
<type>(<scope>): <subject>
<BLANK LINE>
<body>
<BLANK LINE>
<footer>
The header is mandatory and the scope of the header is optional.
Any line of the commit message cannot be longer 100 characters! This allows the message to be easier to read on GitHub as well as in various git tools.
If the commit reverts a previous commit, it should begin with revert:
, followed by the header of the reverted commit. In the body it should say: This reverts commit <hash>.
, where the hash is the SHA of the commit being reverted.
Must be one of the following:
- feat: A new feature
- fix: A bug fix
- docs: Documentation only changes
- style: Changes that do not affect the meaning of the code (white-space, formatting, missing semi-colons, etc)
- refactor: A code change that neither fixes a bug nor adds a feature
- perf: A code change that improves performance
- test: Adding missing tests
- chore: Changes to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries such as documentation generation
The scope could be anything specifying place of the commit change. For example RefinementList
,
refinementList
, rangeSlider
, CI
, url
, build
etc...
The subject contains succinct description of the change:
- use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes"
- don't capitalize first letter
- no dot (.) at the end
Just as in the subject, use the imperative, present tense: "change" not "changed" nor "changes". The body should include the motivation for the change and contrast this with previous behavior.
The footer should contain any information about Breaking Changes and is also the place to reference GitHub issues that this commit Closes.
Breaking Changes should start with the word BREAKING CHANGE:
with a space or two newlines. The rest of the commit message is then used for this.
next
=> Ideas, questions, refactors, bugs that were discuseed, turned into clear actions by the maintainersx.x.x
=> selectednext
actions to be done in a release- no milestone => Still need investigation / discussion
needs api proposal
good change or addition idea. Now in need of a clear API proposalnew widget
new widget ideaready
change accepted and can be done by anyonein progress
you are working on itquestion
anything that's not an accepted bug/new featuredo not merge
still working on a pull request, you want feedback but it's not finished✔ to be released
corresponding pull request was merged. Now waiting for a release before closing the issue