Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Simpler way to review standard annotations in Noctua #50

Open
pgaudet opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Open

Simpler way to review standard annotations in Noctua #50

pgaudet opened this issue Dec 1, 2022 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@pgaudet
Copy link

pgaudet commented Dec 1, 2022

From the Swiss-Prot group:

For annotations that are not pathway-like GO-CAMs (ie, not connected), there should be a simpler way to review annotations, more P2GO-like, ie getting the list of annotations either by searching for a PMID or for a gene id.

This would be required for SP to switch from P2GO to Noctua as the main curation tool.

Thanks, Pascale

@tmushayahama
Copy link
Collaborator

tmushayahama commented Dec 2, 2022

We can approach this by maybe start to think how we should display the annotations that are not pathway-like. What are your thoughts? a table like pathway preview? or a row like amigo row? Then once we make a display view we can easily edit it inline like annotation review. How does P2GO do it?

tagging @pgaudet @vanaukenk @ukemi

@pgaudet
Copy link
Author

pgaudet commented Dec 5, 2022

Here's the P2GO display:

image

In this case not all curators are allowed to edit the annotations, which is why some information is not 'editable' , ie not in boxes.

Thanks, Pascale

@vanaukenk
Copy link

Adding this to the Noctua standard annotation UI project to make sure that once we have a way of displaying 'standard' annotations, the display meets curator needs.

See also:
geneontology/go-shapes#306
geneontology/go-shapes#307

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants