You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In borehole seismic applications, one often has velocity information over certain depth interval only and one is generally not interested in surface phenomena. It would be advantageous to have a datum parameter that allows to have the top of the computational grid not at z=0 but at some chosen depth, thus reducing the size of the computational grid and the computing time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for your comment, @wmheigl. You can provide a topography file with negative elevation to remove that part of the computational domain. However, a free surface boundary condition will still be imposed on the top boundary, which probably is not what you want?
That is correct, Anders. For my needs I would need absorbing boundaries all around the model.
It’s great to see that you follow up the communities suggestions.
In borehole seismic applications, one often has velocity information over certain depth interval only and one is generally not interested in surface phenomena. It would be advantageous to have a datum parameter that allows to have the top of the computational grid not at z=0 but at some chosen depth, thus reducing the size of the computational grid and the computing time.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: