You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have noticed that the Cloud-J photolysis results in a large slowdown in GEOS-Chem 14.4.2, and in 14.5.0-alpha.2 and 14.5.0-alpha.4 (which were added after 14.4.2 was released).
We think this might be related to the implementation of error checks in Cloud-J, which return an error code up to the main program. @lizziel is investigating.
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
Clone GEOS-Chem 14.4.2 (in main branch) as described at geos-chem.readthedocs.io
Create a run directory for the fullchem_benchmark simulation (see geos-chem.readthedocs.io)
Compile and run (see geos-chem.readthedocs.io)
Turn on gcclassic_timers output in the geoschem_config.yml file
Please attach any relevant configuration and log files.
This is the benchmark timing output between 14.4.1 and 14.4.2. We had omitted to notice the large timing increase at the time.
The performance issue was fixed by @lizziel in Cloud-J version 7.7.3, which will now ship with GEOS-Chem version 14.4.3. We can now close out this issue.
Your name
Bob Yantosca
Your affiliation
Harvard + GCST
What happened? What did you expect to happen?
We have noticed that the Cloud-J photolysis results in a large slowdown in GEOS-Chem 14.4.2, and in 14.5.0-alpha.2 and 14.5.0-alpha.4 (which were added after 14.4.2 was released).
We think this might be related to the implementation of error checks in Cloud-J, which return an error code up to the main program. @lizziel is investigating.
What are the steps to reproduce the bug?
gcclassic_timers
output in thegeoschem_config.yml
filePlease attach any relevant configuration and log files.
This is the benchmark timing output between 14.4.1 and 14.4.2. We had omitted to notice the large timing increase at the time.
What GEOS-Chem version were you using?
14.4.2
What environment were you running GEOS-Chem on?
Local cluster
What compiler and version were you using?
gcc 10.2.0
Will you be addressing this bug yourself?
Yes, but I will need some help
In what configuration were you running GEOS-Chem?
GCClassic
What simulation were you running?
Full chemistry
As what resolution were you running GEOS-Chem?
4x5
What meterology fields did you use?
GEOS-FP
Additional information
14.4.2 benchmark plots:
14.4.2 benchmark log:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: