-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SliceDeque flagged as unsafe in 'cargo audit' #29
Comments
Problem with using Is there a way to patch the |
Looking at the very well defined issue in linked above, the problem does look like a trivial fix. It's the fact that the maintainer chose not to respond for over a month that makes me think he's busy with other things and not actively maintaining I can take a swing at fixing the actual issue. Otherwise we'll have to hope that someone takes up the mantel or forks the project and maintains it. I'll try for a PR and see where we end up. I get that |
I sent a PR, gnzlbg/slice_deque#91. Let's see how it evolves. |
I gave up on waiting for the maintainer of Would you like a PR? |
Hello,
as explained in this issue: gnzlbg/slice_deque#90, depending on the crate
SliceDeque
will fail builds that run thecargo audit
command.Would it be possible to circumvent this dependency with
VecDeque
or similar since the maintainer ofSliceDeque
seems to be unresponsive? From my understandingVecDeque
isSend
so switching would also remove anunsafe
impl in the codebase.I could take a swing at this but for some reason I'm having problems building the project right now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: