Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Introduce single variant record custom types first #139

Open
lpil opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #140
Open

Introduce single variant record custom types first #139

lpil opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #140

Comments

@lpil
Copy link
Member

lpil commented Jan 26, 2025

We introduced them with multiple variances first and then introduce them as records after that. This means that it can be unclear to people how to create a single record or struct, like you would find in another language such as C.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

Introduce single-variant record custom type first GearsDatapacks/gleam-language-tour
1 participant
@lpil