Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider review note categories #18

Open
jhpoelen opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 2 comments
Open

consider review note categories #18

jhpoelen opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 2 comments

Comments

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member

jhpoelen commented Feb 4, 2020

Currently, review notes are human readable messages. When creating review reports, categorization of review notes might be handy to answer questions like: "How many date parsing issues were found?"

For now, categorization can be done using simple test filter (e.g., grep "failed to parse"). However, a more structured approach using categories (e.g. category "date parsing" with detailed message like "failed to parse [197-01-01] using pattern [YYYY-mm-DD]"). See also https://github.com/frictionlessdata/goodtables.io/blob/d235660855298fe09e777b79cb314f0e1f58442d/frontend/spec.json can be introduced if needed.

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member Author

jhpoelen commented Feb 4, 2020

related to frictionlessdata/goodtables.io#339 .

@jhpoelen
Copy link
Member Author

jhpoelen commented Feb 4, 2020

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant